https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285944 The Supreme Court determined that the deceased was domiciled in England at the time of his death, leading to the application of English law for succession matters. The court upheld the validity of the Ex. 56 order, rejecting allegations of fraud, and ruled it operated as res judicata for respondents who submitted to the English court's jurisdiction. The court found procedural fairness was met in the foreign proceedings, and minors not submitting to jurisdiction did not impact the order's validity. Ultimately, the court decided that English law governed the distribution of movables and moneys, with sale proceeds distributed accordingly between the defendants. en-us Mon, 15 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Feb 2020 16:22:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285944 The Supreme Court determined that the deceased was domiciled in England at the time of his death, leading to the application of English law for succession matters. The court upheld the validity of the Ex. 56 order, rejecting allegations of fraud, and ruled it operated as res judicata for respondents who submitted to the English court's jurisdiction. The court found procedural fairness was met in the foreign proceedings, and minors not submitting to jurisdiction did not impact the order's validity. Ultimately, the court decided that English law governed the distribution of movables and moneys, with sale proceeds distributed accordingly between the defendants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285944