<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 75 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21264</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in both cases, ruling that the actual rent received should be considered as the fair annual letting value for taxation purposes under the U.P. Rent Control Act provisions. The Court emphasized that if the agreed rent is fair and reasonable at the time of letting out the property, it should be deemed as the fair annual letting value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 75 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21264</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in both cases, ruling that the actual rent received should be considered as the fair annual letting value for taxation purposes under the U.P. Rent Control Act provisions. The Court emphasized that if the agreed rent is fair and reasonable at the time of letting out the property, it should be deemed as the fair annual letting value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>