<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 409 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 58,46,535 and allowing the entire superannuation fund contribution. However, it upheld the disallowance of surtax liability and confirmed the validity of the assessment made by the IAC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 15:02:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 409 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 58,46,535 and allowing the entire superannuation fund contribution. However, it upheld the disallowance of surtax liability and confirmed the validity of the assessment made by the IAC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>