<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 128 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391684</link>
    <description>A writ court should not interfere at the stage of a GST MOV-10 show-cause notice in confiscation proceedings under the CGST regime where statutory remedies remain available. The Gujarat HC declined interference, holding that the petitioner must pursue the prescribed process and that an appeal would lie against any final confiscation order. It also left the petitioner free to seek provisional release of the goods and conveyance under the relevant statutory provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 128 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391684</link>
      <description>A writ court should not interfere at the stage of a GST MOV-10 show-cause notice in confiscation proceedings under the CGST regime where statutory remedies remain available. The Gujarat HC declined interference, holding that the petitioner must pursue the prescribed process and that an appeal would lie against any final confiscation order. It also left the petitioner free to seek provisional release of the goods and conveyance under the relevant statutory provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>