<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 124 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391680</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding tax assessment on the sale of medicines by a nursing home&#039;s dispensary. The Court found that the revisionist failed to provide evidence that medicines were not sold separately, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The Court concluded that the revision lacked merit and upheld the tax imposition, stating that the revisionist&#039;s arguments were unsubstantiated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 08:36:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 124 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391680</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding tax assessment on the sale of medicines by a nursing home&#039;s dispensary. The Court found that the revisionist failed to provide evidence that medicines were not sold separately, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The Court concluded that the revision lacked merit and upheld the tax imposition, stating that the revisionist&#039;s arguments were unsubstantiated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>