<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 121 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391677</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned order dated 29.12.2016 and the notice issued on 31.03.2016 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the proceedings were based on a change of opinion and were initiated beyond the permissible period, making them invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 121 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391677</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the impugned order dated 29.12.2016 and the notice issued on 31.03.2016 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the proceedings were based on a change of opinion and were initiated beyond the permissible period, making them invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>