https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391667 The Tribunal held that the appellant's activity qualifies as job work, allowing them to benefit from the exemption under notification No. 8/2005-ST for service tax on production of goods. The use of their own consumables does not disqualify them from the exemption, and evidence provided through Annexure-II Challans is deemed sufficient to establish excise duty payment by the principal manufacturers. The case was remanded for further assessment on revenue neutrality and verification of excise duty payment by the principal manufacturer. en-us Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Feb 2020 08:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391667 The Tribunal held that the appellant's activity qualifies as job work, allowing them to benefit from the exemption under notification No. 8/2005-ST for service tax on production of goods. The use of their own consumables does not disqualify them from the exemption, and evidence provided through Annexure-II Challans is deemed sufficient to establish excise duty payment by the principal manufacturers. The case was remanded for further assessment on revenue neutrality and verification of excise duty payment by the principal manufacturer. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391667