<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 31 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21259</link>
    <description>For computation of chargeable profits under rule 1(viii) of the First Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, only the dividend income actually included in total income under the Income-tax Act after permissible deductions is excluded, not the gross dividend. The Court treated &quot;income by way of dividends&quot; as linked to the amount already computed for income-tax purposes, reasoning that the surtax computation cannot give a double benefit by excluding more than what formed part of total income. The Explanation inserted from 1 April 1981 was regarded as clarificatory of the existing rule, not as creating a new principle.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:24:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 31 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21259</link>
      <description>For computation of chargeable profits under rule 1(viii) of the First Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, only the dividend income actually included in total income under the Income-tax Act after permissible deductions is excluded, not the gross dividend. The Court treated &quot;income by way of dividends&quot; as linked to the amount already computed for income-tax purposes, reasoning that the surtax computation cannot give a double benefit by excluding more than what formed part of total income. The Explanation inserted from 1 April 1981 was regarded as clarificatory of the existing rule, not as creating a new principle.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>