<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 102 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the absolute confiscation of goods imported without a valid CDSCO certificate under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment modified the impugned order by reducing the quantum of redemption fine and penalties imposed on the appellant company and the director. The appeal was disposed of, sustaining confiscation for some goods while allowing redemption for others, based on the statutory provisions and case-specific circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 102 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the absolute confiscation of goods imported without a valid CDSCO certificate under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment modified the impugned order by reducing the quantum of redemption fine and penalties imposed on the appellant company and the director. The appeal was disposed of, sustaining confiscation for some goods while allowing redemption for others, based on the statutory provisions and case-specific circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>