<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 720 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285930</link>
    <description>The court sanctioned the scheme of compromise under Section 391(2) read with Section 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, subject to certain conditions, including the outcome of pending suits and necessary government approvals. The scheme was found to be in the interest of creditors and feasible for the company&#039;s revival.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:28:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 720 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285930</link>
      <description>The court sanctioned the scheme of compromise under Section 391(2) read with Section 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, subject to certain conditions, including the outcome of pending suits and necessary government approvals. The scheme was found to be in the interest of creditors and feasible for the company&#039;s revival.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>