<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1386 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285921</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to allocate the loan syndication fee between the assessee and its Associated Enterprise (AE) in line with previous decisions attributing 20-25% to the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, granting the assessee an opportunity to present its case again. The order was pronounced on 24th June 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1386 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285921</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to allocate the loan syndication fee between the assessee and its Associated Enterprise (AE) in line with previous decisions attributing 20-25% to the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, granting the assessee an opportunity to present its case again. The order was pronounced on 24th June 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>