<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1710 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285924</link>
    <description>A claim for loss on forward foreign exchange contracts was treated as already settled against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee by an earlier binding decision, so the proposed issue under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 did not raise any substantial question of law. On that basis, the appeal was not entertained and stood dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 15:43:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1710 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285924</link>
      <description>A claim for loss on forward foreign exchange contracts was treated as already settled against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee by an earlier binding decision, so the proposed issue under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 did not raise any substantial question of law. On that basis, the appeal was not entertained and stood dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>