<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1781 - ITAT BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the Revenue and the assessee, providing specific directions on each issue. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of functional comparability in transfer pricing and the necessity of obtaining proper approvals for claiming deductions under Section 10B. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the principle of providing working capital adjustments to ensure parity between the assessee and comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 15:43:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1781 - ITAT BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the Revenue and the assessee, providing specific directions on each issue. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of functional comparability in transfer pricing and the necessity of obtaining proper approvals for claiming deductions under Section 10B. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the principle of providing working capital adjustments to ensure parity between the assessee and comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>