https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391650 The court found the assumption of jurisdiction by the respondent invalid due to the absence of a proper transfer order under Section 127 and the failure to address the petitioner's objections and request for determination under Section 124(4). Consequently, the re-assessment proceedings were annulled, and the writ petition was granted. The court emphasized adherence to procedural protocols to ascertain accurate jurisdiction and prevent double taxation. en-us Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Feb 2020 14:19:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391650 The court found the assumption of jurisdiction by the respondent invalid due to the absence of a proper transfer order under Section 127 and the failure to address the petitioner's objections and request for determination under Section 124(4). Consequently, the re-assessment proceedings were annulled, and the writ petition was granted. The court emphasized adherence to procedural protocols to ascertain accurate jurisdiction and prevent double taxation. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391650