<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 89 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues regarding the deletion of additions under sections 54B and 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) correctly analyzed the facts and applied the law, concluding that there was no need for interference. The order was pronounced on 31st January 2020 at Ahmedabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2020 21:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 89 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues regarding the deletion of additions under sections 54B and 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) correctly analyzed the facts and applied the law, concluding that there was no need for interference. The order was pronounced on 31st January 2020 at Ahmedabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>