<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 84 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391640</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the delay in getting the accounts audited did not warrant a penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, as there was substantial compliance and no revenue loss. The penalty of Rs. 1,37,500 was set aside, and the appeal for the assessment year 2013-14 was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 13:18:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 84 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391640</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the delay in getting the accounts audited did not warrant a penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, as there was substantial compliance and no revenue loss. The penalty of Rs. 1,37,500 was set aside, and the appeal for the assessment year 2013-14 was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>