<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 76 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391632</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed all 13 appeals filed by the assessee, resulting in the deletion of penalties imposed under Sections 271B, 271(1)(c), and 271AAB of the IT Act for the assessment years in question. The tribunal found the penalties under Section 271B unjustified due to applicable precedents, deemed the penalty notices under Section 271(1)(c) vague, and determined no undisclosed income existed for the penalty under Section 271AAB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 76 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391632</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed all 13 appeals filed by the assessee, resulting in the deletion of penalties imposed under Sections 271B, 271(1)(c), and 271AAB of the IT Act for the assessment years in question. The tribunal found the penalties under Section 271B unjustified due to applicable precedents, deemed the penalty notices under Section 271(1)(c) vague, and determined no undisclosed income existed for the penalty under Section 271AAB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>