<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Finance Bill 2020- proposed amendment of meaning of ‘business trust” – seems to rectify drafting error having no significance and suggestion to make proper correction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8935</link>
    <description>Amendment modifies clause (13A) of the Income-tax Act by omitting a terminal conjunctive and adjusting lineation so that the listing requirement for units on a recognised stock exchange clearly attaches to both Infrastructure Investment Trusts and Real Estate Investment Trusts registered under the relevant SEBI regulations. The author treats the proposal as a corrective drafting change, noting absence of any explanatory note and suggesting an alternative insertion of a long line to the same effect; the amendment is characterised as having no substantive policy significance beyond rectifying a typographical inconsistency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 11:28:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 11:28:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Finance Bill 2020- proposed amendment of meaning of ‘business trust” – seems to rectify drafting error having no significance and suggestion to make proper correction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8935</link>
      <description>Amendment modifies clause (13A) of the Income-tax Act by omitting a terminal conjunctive and adjusting lineation so that the listing requirement for units on a recognised stock exchange clearly attaches to both Infrastructure Investment Trusts and Real Estate Investment Trusts registered under the relevant SEBI regulations. The author treats the proposal as a corrective drafting change, noting absence of any explanatory note and suggesting an alternative insertion of a long line to the same effect; the amendment is characterised as having no substantive policy significance beyond rectifying a typographical inconsistency.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Budget - Tax Proposals</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 11:28:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>