<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 43 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391599</link>
    <description>The Appellant&#039;s Appeal was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to failure to appear for hearings, allegations of short payment of duty, and penalty imposition. The Commissioner found no merit in the contentions raised by the Appellant and upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, as no evidence was presented to support claims of rate revision or challenge the findings. Consequently, the Appeal was deemed legally unsound and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 43 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391599</link>
      <description>The Appellant&#039;s Appeal was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to failure to appear for hearings, allegations of short payment of duty, and penalty imposition. The Commissioner found no merit in the contentions raised by the Appellant and upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, as no evidence was presented to support claims of rate revision or challenge the findings. Consequently, the Appeal was deemed legally unsound and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>