https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391594 The Tribunal upheld the demand of interest under Rule 14 of CCR 2004 in a case where the appellant contested the interest liability, arguing it should have been under Rule 6(3A)(e). The Tribunal found the interest rightly demanded under Rule 14, emphasizing compliance requirements and principles of natural justice. The appeal was rejected, confirming the interest liability under Rule 14 and upholding the impugned order passed by the original authority. en-us Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Feb 2020 11:03:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391594 The Tribunal upheld the demand of interest under Rule 14 of CCR 2004 in a case where the appellant contested the interest liability, arguing it should have been under Rule 6(3A)(e). The Tribunal found the interest rightly demanded under Rule 14, emphasizing compliance requirements and principles of natural justice. The appeal was rejected, confirming the interest liability under Rule 14 and upholding the impugned order passed by the original authority. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391594