<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1148 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285897</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10 was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal emphasized that there was no justification for imposing a penalty when no books of account were maintained, especially considering the absence of prescribed books for civil contract business. The decision was based on the legislative expectation for all businesses to maintain books of accounts and a previous ruling that deleted a similar penalty for the assessee in a prior assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2020 17:27:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1148 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285897</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10 was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal emphasized that there was no justification for imposing a penalty when no books of account were maintained, especially considering the absence of prescribed books for civil contract business. The decision was based on the legislative expectation for all businesses to maintain books of accounts and a previous ruling that deleted a similar penalty for the assessee in a prior assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>