<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 53 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21220</link>
    <description>Compensation paid to a partner for reducing his share in a reconstituted firm was treated as a capital receipt because it related to impairment of an income-yielding asset, namely the partner&#039;s share in the firm. The partner&#039;s interest was reduced from 36% to 5%, and there was no material showing that he carried on entering into partnerships as a trading activity. The payment was distinguished from compensation received in the ordinary course of business on termination of a trading arrangement. The receipt was therefore characterised as compensation for loss of a capital asset and held not taxable as revenue income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:20:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 53 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21220</link>
      <description>Compensation paid to a partner for reducing his share in a reconstituted firm was treated as a capital receipt because it related to impairment of an income-yielding asset, namely the partner&#039;s share in the firm. The partner&#039;s interest was reduced from 36% to 5%, and there was no material showing that he carried on entering into partnerships as a trading activity. The payment was distinguished from compensation received in the ordinary course of business on termination of a trading arrangement. The receipt was therefore characterised as compensation for loss of a capital asset and held not taxable as revenue income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>