https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285893 The court dismissed the defendant's application, upholding the order directing the deposit of arrears of rent prior to the institution of the suit under Section 15 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent, and Eviction) Control Act, 1982. The court affirmed the constitutionality of Section 15, stating it serves a reasonable purpose to prevent prolonged litigation without rent payment. Additionally, the court clarified that the law of limitation applies only to arrears before the suit's institution, not during its pendency, ensuring landlords' rights to claim arrears during the suit. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Feb 2020 11:23:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285893 The court dismissed the defendant's application, upholding the order directing the deposit of arrears of rent prior to the institution of the suit under Section 15 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent, and Eviction) Control Act, 1982. The court affirmed the constitutionality of Section 15, stating it serves a reasonable purpose to prevent prolonged litigation without rent payment. Additionally, the court clarified that the law of limitation applies only to arrears before the suit's institution, not during its pendency, ensuring landlords' rights to claim arrears during the suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285893