<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 23 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391579</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge. Regarding the disallowance of depreciation, the Tribunal remanded the issue back to the AO for verification despite the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the disallowance. The addition under Section 40A(3) was also upheld by the Tribunal, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument and citing previous consistent decisions. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 21:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 23 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391579</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge. Regarding the disallowance of depreciation, the Tribunal remanded the issue back to the AO for verification despite the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the disallowance. The addition under Section 40A(3) was also upheld by the Tribunal, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument and citing previous consistent decisions. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>