https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285891 Interference with a show-cause notice under writ jurisdiction is exceptional and is generally unavailable unless the notice is ex facie without jurisdiction, the proceedings are a nullity, or the authority has already conclusively pre-decided the matter. Where the notice is only tentative and factual adjudication is required, the recipient must ordinarily reply before the authority. The text also states that a circular prescribing procedure will not ordinarily be treated as restricting a statutory notification unless a clear conflict or patent illegality is shown. Questions on the scope of a concessional notification and the use of diesel in transport activity were said to require factual and statutory examination by the assessing authority first. en-us Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Mar 2025 10:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285891 Interference with a show-cause notice under writ jurisdiction is exceptional and is generally unavailable unless the notice is ex facie without jurisdiction, the proceedings are a nullity, or the authority has already conclusively pre-decided the matter. Where the notice is only tentative and factual adjudication is required, the recipient must ordinarily reply before the authority. The text also states that a circular prescribing procedure will not ordinarily be treated as restricting a statutory notification unless a clear conflict or patent illegality is shown. Questions on the scope of a concessional notification and the use of diesel in transport activity were said to require factual and statutory examination by the assessing authority first. Case-Laws GST Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285891