<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1165 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391552</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the petition in favor of the petitioner after the respondent acknowledged deficiencies in the vague show cause notice. The GST Officer agreed to withdraw the initial notice and issue a fresh one with specific details, addressing the petitioner&#039;s concerns satisfactorily. Consequently, the original notice was withdrawn, and the case was resolved, allowing for a new notice that clearly outlines the allegations and basis for the tax demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=602046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1165 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391552</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the petition in favor of the petitioner after the respondent acknowledged deficiencies in the vague show cause notice. The GST Officer agreed to withdraw the initial notice and issue a fresh one with specific details, addressing the petitioner&#039;s concerns satisfactorily. Consequently, the original notice was withdrawn, and the case was resolved, allowing for a new notice that clearly outlines the allegations and basis for the tax demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>