<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1156 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391543</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the notice issued for reopening the assessment was not sustainable, rendering the reopening of assessment invalid. As a result, the appeal filed by the revenue was deemed redundant. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 11:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1156 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391543</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the notice issued for reopening the assessment was not sustainable, rendering the reopening of assessment invalid. As a result, the appeal filed by the revenue was deemed redundant. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>