<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1132 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the addition of Rs. 3,96,99,161/-, upholding the assessee&#039;s use of the Project Completion Method for real estate projects. However, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal on the disallowance of commission expenses, affirming the disallowance except for one individual, granting relief of Rs. 24,79,385/-. The decision resulted in no order as to cost.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1132 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the addition of Rs. 3,96,99,161/-, upholding the assessee&#039;s use of the Project Completion Method for real estate projects. However, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal on the disallowance of commission expenses, affirming the disallowance except for one individual, granting relief of Rs. 24,79,385/-. The decision resulted in no order as to cost.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>