<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 213 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285871</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the 70% reservation for Delhi University graduates in post-graduate medical courses but directed the university to review the policy. The petitioner, a non-Delhi University graduate, was granted admission to the Dermatology course. The court emphasized the need for a balanced approach in reservation policies, considering regional needs, national integration, and merit, to prevent discrimination and maintain educational standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:10:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 213 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285871</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the 70% reservation for Delhi University graduates in post-graduate medical courses but directed the university to review the policy. The petitioner, a non-Delhi University graduate, was granted admission to the Dermatology course. The court emphasized the need for a balanced approach in reservation policies, considering regional needs, national integration, and merit, to prevent discrimination and maintain educational standards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>