<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1129 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391516</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted condonation for the delay in filing the appeal before it, emphasizing substantive justice over technicalities. It held that the right to appeal is a substantive right that should not be denied due to procedural lapses. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, highlighting the confusion caused by the transition from manual to electronic filing and stressing the importance of ensuring substantial justice in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 07:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1129 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391516</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted condonation for the delay in filing the appeal before it, emphasizing substantive justice over technicalities. It held that the right to appeal is a substantive right that should not be denied due to procedural lapses. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, highlighting the confusion caused by the transition from manual to electronic filing and stressing the importance of ensuring substantial justice in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>