<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1294 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285864</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of expenses related to exempted income under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that in the absence of exempt income, no disallowance can be made under Section 14A, citing various High Court decisions supporting this interpretation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the order of the CIT (A). The judgment was pronounced on 18-10-2016 by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 07:47:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1294 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285864</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of expenses related to exempted income under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that in the absence of exempt income, no disallowance can be made under Section 14A, citing various High Court decisions supporting this interpretation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the order of the CIT (A). The judgment was pronounced on 18-10-2016 by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>