https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285858 Unpaid insurance premia for a ship were treated as necessaries supplied under section 5 of the Admiralty Courts Act, 1861, because modern shipping practice makes P&I cover commercially essential and the claim therefore constituted a maritime claim. An order refusing to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(a) CPC was held appealable as a preliminary judgment with finality for Clause 15 purposes. However, the plaint failed to disclose a cause of action against the arrested vessel because it did not properly plead legally recognised beneficial ownership or sister ship liability; mere control through a subsidiary was insufficient, so rejection as against that vessel was warranted. en-us Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jan 2020 09:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285858 Unpaid insurance premia for a ship were treated as necessaries supplied under section 5 of the Admiralty Courts Act, 1861, because modern shipping practice makes P&I cover commercially essential and the claim therefore constituted a maritime claim. An order refusing to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(a) CPC was held appealable as a preliminary judgment with finality for Clause 15 purposes. However, the plaint failed to disclose a cause of action against the arrested vessel because it did not properly plead legally recognised beneficial ownership or sister ship liability; mere control through a subsidiary was insufficient, so rejection as against that vessel was warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285858