<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 25 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21191</link>
    <description>The court affirmed that the agricultural land in question became a &#039;capital asset&#039; on April 1, 1970, following an amendment to the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, the court ruled against the assessee regarding the computation of capital gains, stating that the cost of acquisition should be the original cost or the market value as of January 1, 1954, not the market value as of April 1, 1970. The Department was awarded costs assessed at Rs. 300.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 25 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21191</link>
      <description>The court affirmed that the agricultural land in question became a &#039;capital asset&#039; on April 1, 1970, following an amendment to the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, the court ruled against the assessee regarding the computation of capital gains, stating that the cost of acquisition should be the original cost or the market value as of January 1, 1954, not the market value as of April 1, 1970. The Department was awarded costs assessed at Rs. 300.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>