<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 10 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21190</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer could not exceed the directions of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner in the fresh assessment. The Court emphasized that new sources of income not part of the original assessment process should be addressed through appropriate legal provisions like section 147 or section 263 if necessary. The judgment was in favor of the assessee, with Judge S. K. Mohanty concurring, and no costs were incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:17:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 10 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21190</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer could not exceed the directions of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner in the fresh assessment. The Court emphasized that new sources of income not part of the original assessment process should be addressed through appropriate legal provisions like section 147 or section 263 if necessary. The judgment was in favor of the assessee, with Judge S. K. Mohanty concurring, and no costs were incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>