<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 707 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285848</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax lacked jurisdiction to pass a rectification order under section 154 concerning the deduction u/s 80HHC. The Court sided with the assessee, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issue and the lack of clarity in legal interpretation, highlighting the legislative intent to encourage exports and maximize benefits for exporters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:42:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 707 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285848</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax lacked jurisdiction to pass a rectification order under section 154 concerning the deduction u/s 80HHC. The Court sided with the assessee, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issue and the lack of clarity in legal interpretation, highlighting the legislative intent to encourage exports and maximize benefits for exporters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>