<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1115 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391502</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 3,46,66,804/- on account of under-invoicing of exports of iron ores. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:15:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1115 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391502</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 3,46,66,804/- on account of under-invoicing of exports of iron ores. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>