<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Seizure of Jewellery u/s 132 Ruled Invalid; Petitioner Denied Return Despite Legal Breach by Officer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51499</link>
    <description>Validity of Search and seizure action carried out u/s 132 - stock-in-trade (jewellery) was seized - Denial of release of jewellery - No hesitation to observe that the officer in this case has completely ignored the mandate of law. It is also to be mentioned that despite the unlawful action, the Petitioner has been denied release of the jewellery, regardless of his repeatedly representations made to the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:15:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:15:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Seizure of Jewellery u/s 132 Ruled Invalid; Petitioner Denied Return Despite Legal Breach by Officer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51499</link>
      <description>Validity of Search and seizure action carried out u/s 132 - stock-in-trade (jewellery) was seized - Denial of release of jewellery - No hesitation to observe that the officer in this case has completely ignored the mandate of law. It is also to be mentioned that despite the unlawful action, the Petitioner has been denied release of the jewellery, regardless of his repeatedly representations made to the department.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:15:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>