<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1104 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391491</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, deleting certain disallowances while upholding others. The trading addition by adopting a higher GP rate was deleted, while disallowances on account of lack of supporting evidence were upheld. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maintaining proper documentation to substantiate claims and the necessity of adhering to legal provisions for deductions and allowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:14:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1104 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391491</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, deleting certain disallowances while upholding others. The trading addition by adopting a higher GP rate was deleted, while disallowances on account of lack of supporting evidence were upheld. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of maintaining proper documentation to substantiate claims and the necessity of adhering to legal provisions for deductions and allowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>