https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391486 Inherent jurisdiction cannot be used as a substitute for a second revision after a statutory remedy has already been exhausted, and it will be invoked only to prevent abuse of process or miscarriage of justice. In a cheque dishonour prosecution, a demand notice is to be read as a whole; where the cheque details and dishonour are sufficiently disclosed, no interference is warranted. Defences that depend on evidence cannot be tested at the quashing stage, because the accused must place them before the trial court under the Negotiable Instruments Act's special procedure, including the scope for recall of witnesses and defence evidence. No ground was made out to quash the complaint or summoning proceedings. en-us Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:12:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391486 Inherent jurisdiction cannot be used as a substitute for a second revision after a statutory remedy has already been exhausted, and it will be invoked only to prevent abuse of process or miscarriage of justice. In a cheque dishonour prosecution, a demand notice is to be read as a whole; where the cheque details and dishonour are sufficiently disclosed, no interference is warranted. Defences that depend on evidence cannot be tested at the quashing stage, because the accused must place them before the trial court under the Negotiable Instruments Act's special procedure, including the scope for recall of witnesses and defence evidence. No ground was made out to quash the complaint or summoning proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391486