<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1707 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285846</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on deductions under Section 10A for service charges, deputation charges, and unbilled software income. Regarding the transfer pricing adjustment for redemption of preference shares, the ITAT applied safe harbor rules, accepting the redemption price as the arm&#039;s length price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:07:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1707 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285846</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on deductions under Section 10A for service charges, deputation charges, and unbilled software income. Regarding the transfer pricing adjustment for redemption of preference shares, the ITAT applied safe harbor rules, accepting the redemption price as the arm&#039;s length price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>