<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1935 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by ruling that the interest income should be treated as business income due to its connection with the project. The issue of revenue expenditure deduction was remanded back to the CIT(A) for proper adjudication, and the levy of interest under Section 234B was deemed consequential and dependent on the final demand. The decision was pronounced on 12.09.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:43:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1935 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by ruling that the interest income should be treated as business income due to its connection with the project. The issue of revenue expenditure deduction was remanded back to the CIT(A) for proper adjudication, and the levy of interest under Section 234B was deemed consequential and dependent on the final demand. The decision was pronounced on 12.09.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>