<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 62 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21181</link>
    <description>A partnership remains valid where two or more persons agree to share profits of a business carried on by all or any of them acting for all, and section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 does not require every partner to personally manage the business or contribute capital. The existence of a genuine firm is primarily a question of fact. Where profits are actually divided and credited under the partnership deed and the arrangement is otherwise complied with, the presence of dormant partners or control by only some partners does not by itself negate the firm. On that basis, the assessee-firm was treated as genuine and entitled to registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:56:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 62 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21181</link>
      <description>A partnership remains valid where two or more persons agree to share profits of a business carried on by all or any of them acting for all, and section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 does not require every partner to personally manage the business or contribute capital. The existence of a genuine firm is primarily a question of fact. Where profits are actually divided and credited under the partnership deed and the arrangement is otherwise complied with, the presence of dormant partners or control by only some partners does not by itself negate the firm. On that basis, the assessee-firm was treated as genuine and entitled to registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>