https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285837 The proviso to Section 13(2)(i) was treated as a tenant-protective cure for the default that founded the eviction petition. "Arrears of rent" was read in light of the petition and statutory purpose to mean only the rent in dispute up to the date of the landlord's application, not rent accruing after proceedings began. The Controller's enquiry was confined to the pleaded grievance, so deposit of the arrears due up to the application date was sufficient on the first hearing. en-us Sat, 16 May 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:29:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285837 The proviso to Section 13(2)(i) was treated as a tenant-protective cure for the default that founded the eviction petition. "Arrears of rent" was read in light of the petition and statutory purpose to mean only the rent in dispute up to the date of the landlord's application, not rent accruing after proceedings began. The Controller's enquiry was confined to the pleaded grievance, so deposit of the arrears due up to the application date was sufficient on the first hearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 16 May 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285837