<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 61 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21180</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the losses in the &#039;hessian hedge account&#039; and &#039;gunny hedge account&#039; were business losses and not speculation losses. The Court upheld the findings of the Tribunal, emphasizing the applicability of proviso (a) to section 43(5) to merchanting businesses as well, not restricted to manufacturers only. This decision provides clarity on the treatment of such losses in the context of business activities, ensuring compliance with the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:54:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 61 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21180</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the losses in the &#039;hessian hedge account&#039; and &#039;gunny hedge account&#039; were business losses and not speculation losses. The Court upheld the findings of the Tribunal, emphasizing the applicability of proviso (a) to section 43(5) to merchanting businesses as well, not restricted to manufacturers only. This decision provides clarity on the treatment of such losses in the context of business activities, ensuring compliance with the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>