<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 382 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285828</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld interim orders for pay parity between Supreme Court and Delhi High Court staff. The recommendations of the Committee of Judges were accepted for interim implementation, with final rules to be framed under Article 146 of the Constitution. The Chief Justice of India was empowered to make rules without constraints from interim orders, ensuring fair and equitable pay scales for Supreme Court employees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:29:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 382 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285828</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld interim orders for pay parity between Supreme Court and Delhi High Court staff. The recommendations of the Committee of Judges were accepted for interim implementation, with final rules to be framed under Article 146 of the Constitution. The Chief Justice of India was empowered to make rules without constraints from interim orders, ensuring fair and equitable pay scales for Supreme Court employees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>