https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391463 Revisional interference with a cognizance order under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC is confined to cases of perversity, illegality, lack of jurisdiction, or manifest irregularity, and the court at cognizance only verifies whether the complaint and material disclose grounds to proceed; on that basis, the cognizance under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was upheld because the material disclosed alleged laundering activity and involvement in proceeds of crime. The court also reiterated that the offence under Section 3 of the PMLA is independent and stand-alone. On warrants, refusal to convert arrest warrants into bailable warrants was sustained because issuance of process depends on the seriousness of the allegations, the accused's conduct, and whether lesser process would secure appearance, and no perversity or jurisdictional error was shown. en-us Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jan 2020 07:06:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391463 Revisional interference with a cognizance order under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC is confined to cases of perversity, illegality, lack of jurisdiction, or manifest irregularity, and the court at cognizance only verifies whether the complaint and material disclose grounds to proceed; on that basis, the cognizance under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was upheld because the material disclosed alleged laundering activity and involvement in proceeds of crime. The court also reiterated that the offence under Section 3 of the PMLA is independent and stand-alone. On warrants, refusal to convert arrest warrants into bailable warrants was sustained because issuance of process depends on the seriousness of the allegations, the accused's conduct, and whether lesser process would secure appearance, and no perversity or jurisdictional error was shown. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391463