<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1069 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391456</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the case back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision within three months, emphasizing the importance of considering the joint venture agreement and remand report. The judgment underscored the significance of accounting principles, liability recognition, and the genuineness of entries in determining tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:52:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1069 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391456</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the case back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision within three months, emphasizing the importance of considering the joint venture agreement and remand report. The judgment underscored the significance of accounting principles, liability recognition, and the genuineness of entries in determining tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>