<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1522 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285820</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding the reassessment as bad in law due to lack of tangible material post-initial assessment, deeming it a mere change of opinion without legal basis. Consequently, the disallowance of repairs and maintenance expenses was not addressed as the primary issue of reopening was decided in favor of the assessee. The appeal was allowed on 27th May 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:49:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1522 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285820</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding the reassessment as bad in law due to lack of tangible material post-initial assessment, deeming it a mere change of opinion without legal basis. Consequently, the disallowance of repairs and maintenance expenses was not addressed as the primary issue of reopening was decided in favor of the assessee. The appeal was allowed on 27th May 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>