<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1779 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285824</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that a central government organization was not liable to pay interest for delayed service tax payments. The Tribunal had ruled in favor of the organization, citing its status and daily remittances to the Consolidated Fund of India. The HC found no substantial question of law, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s correct application of legal principles and factual circumstances. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1779 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285824</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that a central government organization was not liable to pay interest for delayed service tax payments. The Tribunal had ruled in favor of the organization, citing its status and daily remittances to the Consolidated Fund of India. The HC found no substantial question of law, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s correct application of legal principles and factual circumstances. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>