<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1038 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391425</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. The court found that the allocation of R&amp;amp;D expenditure to the Pondicherry unit was unjustified as no products were manufactured there during the relevant year. Additionally, the court held that capital expenditure should be excluded from total R&amp;amp;D expenditure. The court also addressed the computation of deductions under Sections 80HHC and 80-IB, ruling in favor of the assessee pending the Supreme Court&#039;s decision on related issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1038 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391425</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. The court found that the allocation of R&amp;amp;D expenditure to the Pondicherry unit was unjustified as no products were manufactured there during the relevant year. Additionally, the court held that capital expenditure should be excluded from total R&amp;amp;D expenditure. The court also addressed the computation of deductions under Sections 80HHC and 80-IB, ruling in favor of the assessee pending the Supreme Court&#039;s decision on related issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>